I wrote the following column ten years ago at the start of the new century. I offer it again here as a check on my own optimism (at the time) and to keep us all focused on what our generation is accomplishing (and not accomplishing) in pursuit of our destiny.
Well what do you know! It looks like the Y2K fears, which ranged from computer meltdowns to “apocalypse now,” were, um, how shall I say it, a bit overblown? As best I can determine, the most serious glitch occurred when one state sent out vehicle license renewal notices advising owners to get their “horseless carriages” re-registered. And even that one had the sound of some bureaucrat’s idea of a joke.
So here we are, ensconced firmly, by at least a few days, in the new millennium. And, with the rollover of the calendar to twenty double aught, we are also in the first days of the twenty-first century. Hooray for us!
By pure coincidence, I’m sure, the woman who was listed in the record books as the oldest living person died last week at the age of 119. She was described as being remarkably lucid right up to her last days. The story was reported in all the major news media, and so it should have been. To live almost twelve decades and still maintain one’s faculties is big news.
But a similar story won’t be big news one hundred years from now, which is how I’d like to begin this look ahead at the twenty-first century. The year 2100 will almost certainly see many survivors from the twentieth century, and one would expect that most of them will be able to describe the development of the Internet and the impeachment of Bill Clinton with some degree of specificity, even though those events took place when they were still young children.
What I am saying is that there is a remarkable future in store for us, and it will make what we now think of as a normal life seem archaic beyond belief. Here are some developments which I fully expect our children will live to see.
In the field of science and medicine, we will find cures (or preventive measures) in the next hundred years for many of the leading killer diseases of today. Some of these will come in the form of vaccines, others will be in the development of chemicals (the twenty-first century version of antibiotics) and many will be in the soon-to-be-exploding field of gene therapy.
The long and short of it is that we are about to develop the means to live (and to live well) for well in excess of 100 years, and if you doubt that prediction, you either are not paying attention or have an unduly pessimistic view of human intelligence.
The history of humankind clearly establishes a pattern of increasingly great strides in the fight against disease. And the acceleration of the successes we’ve achieved is geometric if not exponential, so that one can envision advances occurring more rapidly and more dramatically as each decade passes.
True, we have not found a magic bullet to cure or prevent most cancers, but we know much more about the causes and courses of malignancies than we did even ten years ago. Likewise, heart disease and cardio-vascular malfunctions still occur, but not nearly in so random and haphazard a fashion as we used to assume was the case. We understand now how to prevent many of these illnesses, and others are curable through life-style modifications or surgical intervention. We have all but wiped out most of the dreaded childhood diseases of one hundred years ago, and in the next hundred years, the best guess is that many adult maladies will also be conquered.
Will we achieve immortality? No, I suspect that breakthrough might be a bit farther down the road. Bodies will still age (albeit more slowly) and organs and systems will ultimately still fail (but perhaps less painfully). Most of our recent ancestors who were born in the year 1900 thought they might live to see 65 and actually lived to see 75 or 80. We now predict those born this year will live to see the age of 80, and in fact, many will survive into the next century.
And they will witness a world few of us would recognize or imagine possible.
The first major change I anticipate in our everyday lives will be the replacement of the telephone with the Internet. My guess is that within ten years, every individual who wants one will have a web page (much as we now have phone numbers) and that we will soon thereafter contact each other not by phone but by computer. I’m no Bill Gates, but it is easy to imagine that this technology is about to explode. In the last two years alone we have seen virtually every business develop a web site, and the on-line economy is about to supplant the shopping malls that were so in vogue only ten years ago. Can similar changes on the personal level be far behind?
We’ll all have our own web sites (maybe they’ll be called “personal pages”) on which we will “publish” our calendars (to the extent we want to), and our friends and associates will be able to determine where we are, what we are doing, and how long we intend to be doing it (again, to the extent that we choose to make that information available). Internet-conferencing will soon replace teleconferencing and virtual offices will provide all the hard space most of us will need to conduct our business affairs. And I’m sure I’m only describing the most rudimentary of systems that will soon be in place for our personal convenience.
Space (of the “outer” variety) will continue to be the last frontier, but it will be far less foreign to us in this new century. By the year 2100, we will have established a substantial presence on the moon, with millions of us living in a variety of colonies that will be self-governed (i.e. without regard to national allegiance), thereby providing new laboratories for experiments in governance. It is also entirely conceivable that we will develop societies that live under the seas, especially as the higher sea levels resulting from global warming continue to make available land scarcer.
And as our world becomes figuratively if not literally smaller, I expect we will see a diminution of national identities. Certainly we touch on the most difficult and delicate of humanity’s ongoing struggles with itself when we talk of nationalism and the concomitant traits of ethnic and racial identity, but I expect that over the next hundred years we will see a gradual softening of some of the rigid and zealous identification that is still very much a part of our condition with regard to these factors.
The idea of one world, without national citizenship, has some appeal, but it probably won’t occur any time soon. On the other hand, the importance of one’s country diminishes as the interests, goals and essential structure of all the world’s nations become more clearly congruent. A worldwide economy, of which we are already on the verge, will reduce the need for parochial protectionism, and greater communication will inevitably lead to reduced resistance to cultural and societal “cross-pollination.”
Without these barriers, we are less likely to feel threatened by each other and more likely to seek ways to join in regional communities. We are already seeing a move toward unification in Europe. I expect the Americas (North and South) might well be next, and with the pre-eminence of the United States becoming less pronounced in the long term, a world-wide community or federation of individual states is certainly conceivable.
Similarly, racial and ethnic identities will be harder to define as we move to a more pluralistic and integrated world community. Miscegenation was viewed with open hostility as recently as 50 years ago. Now “other” may be the fastest growing racial identity, and “racial minority” will likely have all but lost any significance at some point towards the end of this new century.
Work, as we currently think of it, will likely become less structured in the next hundred years. Self-employment is probably going to become much more common as many find ways to commercialize their skills and expertise without the necessity of an office or an employer. Continuing a trend that has already taken root, corporate home offices will give way to offices in the home. And the nine-to-five job with a couple hours tacked on at either end for the commute will be replaced by the ultimate flex plan, in which we work on a schedule of our own choosing.
There will undoubtedly be more leisure time in this new century of ours, much of it due to the fact that we will be able to do things so much faster and with such great efficiency. As time seemingly expands, all of the entertainment industries will find ways to attract our attention. Much of the growth in this field will likely be computer-oriented, but I suspect live entertainment, perhaps of the interactive variety, will also be a growth market.
I can envision sporting events that include the fans as coaches, deciding on strategic moves during the course of a game. It is also conceivable that we will have individualized movies, with the script and action adjusted according to the immediate whims of any and every person in the audience on a given night.
Vacation resorts should continue to blossom, with more of us seeking more time in beautiful surroundings to contemplate our navels. (One thing that I’m convinced won’t change is the game of golf, which will continue to bedevil and intoxicate the most stolid of personalities, bringing out the Mr. Hyde in every Dr. Jekyll at least once in every round that is played.)
Helping us get through these exciting times will be many forms of robotics, some perhaps with what will pass for personalities. How soon these “household appliances” will be available is a matter of some conjecture, but as is the case for much of the prophecy contained herein, the wise bet would be sooner rather than later.
And for the children of this twenty-first century, we may soon see the end of studying, in the traditional sense at least. It is entirely probable that at some point in the next hundred years, the entirety of human history will be implantable in everyone’s brain in the form of a computer chip. Other scholastic disciplines shouldn’t be far behind, with the result that higher education will emphasize how to access and process the information we already have instead of stressing the need to commit it to memory in the first place.
Some may scoff at these predictions and claim they ignore the dark clouds that threaten our very existence. Yes, I understand. I tend to be somewhat of a worrisome cynic myself. And the aforementioned global warming, the increase in horrible violence among our youth, the seeming inability of people of different cultures and ethnicities to get along, and the continuing threat of terrorism, nuclear annihilation and Armageddons of one type or another do not escape my attention.
But with all that said, this species of ours continues to strive and to thrive. One hundred years ago we were on the verge of a new age, one that included then unimagined wonders like computers and antibiotics. The pace of our acquisition of knowledge, and the discoveries that come with it, is ever-increasing.
We may be our own worst enemies, but we are also possessed of a magical power, and in the century that is before us, we will come closer than ever to Mount Olympus.
Viking Daughter says
Excellent article without all the doom and gloom.
As an internet fan, I can’t wait for the new supercomputer to arrive. I believe this is our pathway to a new beginning.
I believe the CERN collider is the biggest modern discovery to date, and once it actually functions to it’s maximum– the knowledge we gain about our origins millions of years ago will put our lives into perspective. It will also redefine religion, and our beliefs, or lack of beliefs in God.
Hopefully, it’s launched this year with success, and we can take Stephan Hawkings theories to a whole new level.
I’m looking forward to 2012.
My own beliefs on the Mayan and I Ching ending in Dec of 2012 is they ascended somehow into a new dimension or level of spirituality that transcended ours. I think we can all agree we have definitely ascended spiritually and intellectually, with rapid speed in the past 50 years. With the new supercomputer, we would advance to a level that would truly boggle the present mind.
My analysis based on my own strong beliefs in God, is a ”rapture” which will seperate those who have ascended, and those who are living lives not conducive to a productive, peaceful earth. The war mongers will have the pleasure of residing with each other in their own self created earth. In other words, we will all actually live the lives we chose or created.
Just my thoughts on our future…it’s 7 a.m. so forgive any ramblings.
Jerry Todd says
Well said Ed and Viking Daughter! Following our lady friend’s and my fairly common beliefs, my own vision of eternity is definitely not floating on a cloud playing a harp. As an engineer, I can see an eternity spent discovering, sharing with others, rejoicing and praising our Creator in an economy whose currency is pure Love.
As for now, we have to deal with retaining Ed’s optimism while remembering John Naisbitt’s 1980 book “Megatrends” wherein he extolled the coming advances of “high tech and high touch,” while warning that we keep hoping technology will deliver us from moral responsibility. It never has and it never will.
While maybe being outdone by Ed’s wonderful insights, I recently dug up some of my own 12 and 20 year old predictions, among which are:
1. May, 1990 (Part of a proposed youth development program) – ENVIRONMENT, POPULATION AND NEW AGE RELIGION Environmental issues have brought natural religions and other falsehoods to the surface along with agendas for one world government and socialistic society. God gave us this world to run and care for, and admittedly, we could have done better. The urgency for environmental restoration and management is more a Christian charge than trendy “New Age” religion and philosophy. Environmental issues are a perfect bandwagon for utterly strange philosophies to erode our society and means of making a living. There is a real urgency to resolve our neglect of God’s command to use His creation responsibly, but not at the expense of freedom, enterprise, children or true progress. A whole “new” religion is being built around this issue, and Christians need to be a ware of it.
2. October 24, 1998
Letters Editor
THE CALIFORNIAN
P.O. Box 440
Bakersfield, CA 93302 – Sent by FAX
Dear Editor:
I’m for labor unions, but have a real problem with public employee unions. There’s a “Catch-22” here, because public employees need some form of collective bargaining at times, but the power they exercise in the body politic has become a possibly terminal cancer in our society.
When they run their own candidates or push the election of others, they are cementing the status quo and bureaucratic inefficiency into the workings of the community and nation. See what a horrible price our children and wallets have paid for the power of the now well entrenched educational establishment!
One politician’s ad sneers that his opponent has a “0” National Education Association rating. That, for those of us who hate socialism from the core of our beings, is the highest praise one could reap on a candidate. For the rest of you, cry for your beloved country for what you are doing to it!
**********************
“No new sins, just new spins!” GVT 1/5/10
Ashley says
Wow, Professor Telfeyan, you must be some kind of sorcerer! 🙂
Very insightful predictions, indeed!
It’s interesting, you wrote this before the explosion of social networking sites (your garden variety Myspace, Facebook, and Twitter) . Impressive. I realize that social networking sites were in existence ten years ago (and before), but it was not mainstream. It was the instrument of cyber trolls, university students, and of course the desperate and lonely (often the same people). Now almost everyone has a “personal page” in the form of a blog or through one of the more popular SNSs. It’s now a natural part of our daily lives, as you predicted. Instant messages, texts, emails and status updates are the predominant modes of communication.
But I don’t know that computers or technology, in general, has given us any more leisure time or has made us more efficient. I think technology has improved society and has made us healthier and more efficient, overall. But I don’t think “we” as individuals are getting more done. I think we do more, but I don’t think it’s anything productive.
I find that most people are just wasting a bunch of time, pushing buttons all day long. Don’t get me wrong, I love that we have all of these great tools. But all I see wherever I go are crowds of people compulsively checking their FB pages or frantically texting sweet nothings to beautiful strangers instead of actually working on anything of substance. I see what people are up to on their screens. It’s just a bunch of feral Facebooking, IMing, and gossiping like yentas. Okay, okay, it’s more than that. There’s also a lot of solitaire and Fairy Tale Football going on.
But guess what they aren’t doing?
Technology, to a point, is awesome, but without limits, it becomes counterproductive.
Honestly, I get more done kickin’ it old school. All I really need is a #2 pencil, maybe a good pen, and some paper. I have to fight my impulse to google every random thought that hits me, but when I manage to get away from my computer, I get more out of class, I’m more productive, and as result I’m a better listener, student, thinker, writer–everything.
Is all of this technology really improving our lives? Don’t get me wrong, I love technology. I’ve been to Fry’s 5 times in the last two weeks. And I’m considered a “regular” at the Apple Store here. I’m the first person freaking out when there’s no internet access. I’m an information junkie.
I’m not suggesting that you give up all of your worldly possessions in order to live the “Little House on the Prairie” lifestyle.
I’m driving at something deeper here. We have a zillion ways to communicate with each other, we are connected 24/7, but has it really improved communication among people? Are we, in fact, more productive? Are we focusing on what truly matters?